Understanding the Necessity of Net Positive: Biomimicry in Energy Developments
- Meghna Routhu
- May 23
- 9 min read
Did you know whales played an important role in the design of offshore wind turbines? By observing how whales move their tails, researchers were inspired to redesign tidal turbine blades to mimic wave motion. This was done by adding the texture of tubercles, the nodules that create the curvy pattern on whale fins.
Despite harsh testing across wave conditions, this innovation produced a constant, stable performance. This success speaks to the importance of biomimicry, where innovators look to nature for inspiration to solve problems. The term was coined in 1997 by Janine Benyus in her book, Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. In an On Being podcast episode with Krista Tippett, Benyus defined it as “the conscious emulation of life’s genius.” This relates to how the form, process, and ecosystem must all be included when applying biomimicry to solutions (Kennedy, Emily, et al.). Biomimicry innovations are also supporting industry growth. According to a report from the Fermanian Business & Economic Institute, “By 2030, bioinspiration could account for $425 billion of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) in terms of 2013 dollars.” Taking approximately 40% inflation into account, this amount would be estimated to be $595 billion to $605 billion, as of April 2026.
The success of such innovations highlights how biomimicry technologies add large-scale value to countries. As companies face growing energy demands and climate pressures rise, biomimicry becomes increasingly valuable as it combines resilient nature with emerging technologies. Although a study from the Biomimetics journal found that perceived risk and cost are reported to be consistent barriers against implementing biomimicry solutions. While sustainability is believed to be costly, biomimicry exemplifies the opposite: utilizing biomimicry in energy developments creates a competitive advantage across the renewable industries and can be a successful investment beyond the triple bottom line.
Wind Energy
Connecting back to the undulated whale design mentioned earlier, success has been reported by WhalePower Corporation, which applies this biomimicry design through its patented Tubercle Technology. The tests conducted at The Wind Energy Institute of Canada found that WhalePower Corporation’s tubercle design produces 20% more annualized power than their original design without a tubercle (“Tests.”, 2014). In addition to this test result, Biomimicry 3.8, a consultancy firm founded by Janine Benyus, found “8% improvement in lift and 32% reduction in drag, as well as allowing for a 40% increase in angle of attack over smooth flippers before stalling” for similar designs [See Figure 2].
Thus, highlighting how biomimicry advances the performance of energy innovations and provides a greater degree of efficiency. This is especially important when one considers how energy consumption is continuing to grow, so having more efficient technologies from utilizing biomimicry creates more value (“Energy Markets Race…”, 2026).
Similar success has also been observed when Caltech researchers investigated how the spatial arrangement of vertical-axis wind turbines (VAWTs) can be optimized by looking at vortex wake patterns generated by schooling fish as inspiration. While conventional horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) suffer from significant power losses when placed in proximity, VAWTs may actually experience enhanced performance under similar conditions. Using a potential flow model, the researchers found that a geometric arrangement of a 16×16 VAWT array could produce power density improvements over an order of magnitude when compared to traditional HAWT farms for the same land area. While the new design was found to be individually less efficient compared to HAWTs, the key mechanism involves stream-tube contraction between pairs of counter-rotating VAWTs. Like the hydrodynamic benefits fish gain from positioning themselves in the vortex wakes of their neighbors, this accelerates airflow and boosts energy output.
Another similar innovation is inspired by bird wings that enable robust aerodynamic force production and stable flight. A study from a group of engineers proposed a biomimetic blade design for small wind turbines that achieves a high integral power coefficient across a broad range of tip-speed ratios. It also enhances aerodynamic robustness in a variety of wind conditions. The researchers used computational fluid dynamics to study the effects of blade flexion. This is where they learned that a swept-forward shape near the wing root improved performance at lower tip-speed ratios while a swept-backward distal section boosted performance at higher ratios. The optimized flexion blade outperforms conventional straight blades, with a biomimetic robustness index demonstrating its superior performance. Thus demonstrating another example of how biomimicry enhances performance that is then compounded when applied on a larger scale.
Solar Energy
Under the rise of public support for solar energy related policy, adding biomimicry to the solar energy industry creates similar advantages in performances (“Temporal Stability of…”, 2026). One such advantage is how New Iridium has created a suite of organic chemicals that enable photocatalysis, light-driven chemistry, eliminating the need for heavy metals or heat as catalysts (“Low-Energy Chemical…”). Their technology dramatically reduces the energy and time required for a wide variety of chemical reactions, lowering costs and paving the way for green chemistry to become industry standard. For energy companies, this innovation represents a direct competitive advantage by helping work toward developing a platform that mimics photosynthesis by using light energy to convert water and CO₂ into chemical energy.
Taking inspiration from photosynthesis can also extend into adapting physical products. Harvesting light is the focus of a device from the University of Cambridge that integrates organic semiconductors with enzymes from sulfate-reducing bacteria, splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen or converting carbon dioxide into formate, mimicking photosynthesis, the process plants use to convert sunlight into energy, and operates entirely on its own power. Unlike earlier prototypes that relied on toxic or unstable light absorbers, the new biohybrid design avoids toxic semiconductors, lasts longer, and can run without additional chemical additives. In tests, the team successfully used sunlight to convert CO₂ into formate and applied it directly in a "domino" sequence of reactions to synthesize a pharmaceutical compound with high yield and purity, marking the first time organic semiconductors have been used as the light-harvesting component in this type of biohybrid device. This breakthrough illustrates how biomimicry creates value beyond the triple bottom line: reducing toxic byproducts addresses environmental liability, self-powered operation lowers long-run costs, and the ability to produce pharmaceutical-grade compounds from sunlight alone opens entirely new revenue streams that conventional energy chemistry cannot access.
Hydropower Energy
Wind and solar energy aren’t the only industries where biomimicry has found success. The bioWAVE™ system is mounted to the seafloor with three floating blades and a flexible stem that responds to the movement of ocean waves (“Resilient Wave Energy…”). The motion is converted into energy via an onboard conversion module that transforms wave motion into hydraulic pressure, which spins a turbine to generate grid-quality electricity. The unit can also sink and flatten against the seafloor to avoid damage from excess wave energy, a design inspired by the flexible, wave-resistant structure of seaweed. By embedding nature's own durability mechanisms directly into the hardware, bioWAVE™ reduces maintenance risk and downtime in one of energy's harshest operating environments, a tangible competitive advantage over rigid conventional marine energy systems.
Hydropower-related biomimicry was also explored by a team from Georgia Tech, which created a nature-inspired energy generator that produces clean, renewable electricity from underwater sea currents (“Designing Climate-Change…”, 2021). The design was influenced by the bell-shaped body of jellyfish, how schools of fish position themselves, how heart valves move liquid, and how kelp blades are adapted to rapidly flowing water. Using all four of these organisms, the team aimed to create a more efficient and lower-cost way to generate power, making it available to areas vulnerable to electricity shortages. That last point carries significant social capital value: expanding reliable electricity access to underserved regions is precisely the kind of outcome the economics of mutuality accounts for and conventional cost-benefit analysis ignores. Thus, reinforcing why biomimicry investments deserve to be evaluated on a broader measure of return
Any application of biomimicry as an energy strategy must acknowledge the concerns that slow how we adopt and evaluate it. The majority of the research cited originates from academic institutions, innovation accelerators, and sustainability-focused organizations such as the Biomimicry Institute, whose mandate is to champion nature-inspired design. While the science is rigorous, the framing is inherently optimistic to translate into a for-profit lens. Peer-reviewed studies on tubercle-enhanced wind turbines or semi-artificial leaves tend to report best-case performance metrics under controlled conditions, and the path from laboratory prototype to commercial-scale deployment is rarely as linear as the literature implies. Acknowledging this does not invalidate the findings; it simply means that business leaders and policymakers should evaluate biomimicry claims with the same scrutiny they would apply to any emerging technology, asking not only whether it works, but whether it scales, and at what cost.
The most persistent and credible counterargument is economic. Biomimicry-inspired solutions frequently carry higher upfront development and manufacturing costs than their conventional counterparts. A wind turbine blade engineered with whale-tubercle geometry requires more sophisticated tooling and testing than a standard blade. A semi-artificial leaf that integrates bacterial enzymes with organic semiconductors involves materials and fabrication processes that remain far from mass production. For a small energy company operating on thin margins, or a government agency allocating a fixed infrastructure budget, the immediate cost differential is not trivial, and the criticism that biomimicry remains a technology for well-resourced institutions rather than the broader market is one worth taking seriously. This concern is amplified when incumbent fossil fuel technologies carry decades of subsidization and infrastructure investment behind them, making direct cost comparisons inherently uneven and, in that sense, biased against any newcomer. However, this objection weakens considerably when the unit of measurement expands beyond short-term financial cost.
The framework of the economics of mutuality offers a compelling reorientation: rather than evaluating a technology solely on its immediate return on investment, companies are invited to account for their performance across three interdependent forms of capital: human, natural, environmental, and social. Under this lens, a biomimicry investment that costs more upfront may simultaneously reduce a company's environmental liability, strengthen its social license to operate, attract talent motivated by purpose-driven work, and position it favorably within tightening regulatory environments that are beginning to price carbon and resource depletion into business risk. These are not abstract benefits; they are increasingly material to long-term enterprise value and the categories that conventional cost-benefit analysis tends to discount or ignore entirely. The economics of mutuality also reframes the policy argument. When governments finance biomimicry research, they are not simply subsidizing one technology over another. They are investing in the development of human capital through scientific expertise, in natural capital through reduced ecological harm, and in social capital through the creation of industries and communities built around regenerative principles. The long-term return on that investment, measured across all three dimensions, consistently outpaces the short-term cost savings of continuing to fund conventional approaches.
The takeaway, therefore, is that cost concerns are real, and they deserve transparent engagement. Biomimicry does not fail the economic test; it reveals the inadequacy of the test we have been using.
The innovations explored, from wind farms arranged like schooling fish to artificial leaves that photosynthesize clean fuel, reveal a compelling truth: nature has already solved many of the engineering challenges we are only beginning to confront. Biomimicry is not a niche scientific curiosity; it is a rapidly maturing discipline with measurable real-world impact. Whether it is humpback whale tubercles delivering a 32% reduction in drag on wind turbine blades, or enzyme-powered semiconductors converting sunlight and CO₂ into pharmaceutical-grade chemicals without toxic byproducts, these breakthroughs demonstrate that the greatest design library on Earth is the one that has been evolving for four billion years.
Business leaders who ignore this shift risk falling behind competitors already integrating biomimetic principles into their energy sourcing, infrastructure, and investment portfolios, including a growing class of biomimicry-focused asset management companies offering exposure to this emerging sector. The stakes extend well beyond the boardroom. Policymakers have a critical window of opportunity to direct research funding, tax incentives, and regulatory frameworks toward biomimicry-driven energy innovation. This is an area where public investment can dramatically accelerate commercialization and close the gap between laboratory breakthrough and grid-scale deployment. Students, meanwhile, are positioned at perhaps the most exciting moment in this field's history: the tools, databases, and interdisciplinary frameworks to translate nature's genius into engineered solutions have never been more accessible. Explore AskNature. Read the research. Ask what a whale, a beetle, or a school of fish might teach your next design challenge. The natural world is not separate from our energy future, but rather is the blueprint for it.
References:
“Case Example: Learning from Whales to Create Efficient Wind Power.” (n.d.). Biomimicry 3.8. https://biomimicry.net/the-buzz/resources/case-examples-learning-whales-create-efficient-wind-power/
“Designing Climate-Change Solutions with Inspiration from Nature.” (2021, October 13). School of Biological Sciences | Georgia Institute of Technology. https://biosciences.gatech.edu/news/designing-climate-change-solutions-inspiration-nature-1
Dickson, M. (2018). Biomimetics and biomimesis in the academy: The clash between engineering and biology in the university (PhD dissertation: Irreducible complexity and the problem of underdetermination in the created order). Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/79361855/Biomimetics_and_Biomimesis_in_the_the_academy_the_clash_between_engineering_and_biology_in_the_university_PhD_dissertation_Irreducible_Complexity_and_the_problem_of_Underdetermination_in_the_Created_Order_
“Economics of Mutuality Alliance.” (2024, August 18). Economics of Mutuality Alliance. https://eom.org/knowledge-hub-content/leading-with-purpose-introducing-our-executive-education-program-5ctaz
“Energy Markets Race to Solve the AI Power Bottleneck.” (2026). Morgan Stanley. https://www.morganstanley.com/insights/articles/powering-ai-energy-market-outlook-2026
Fermanian Business & Economic Institute. (2013, November). Bioinspiration: An economic progress report. Point Loma Nazarene University.
“Janine Benyus — Biomimicry, an Operating Manual for Earthlings.” (n.d.). On Being. https://onbeing.org/programs/janine-benyus-biomimicry-an-operating-manual-for-earthlings/
Jones, R. V., et al. (2024, August 3). Opinion: Applications of and barriers to the use of biomimicry towards a sustainable architectural, engineering and construction industry based on interviews from experts and practitioners in the field. Biomimetics, 9(8), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9080470
Kennedy, E., et al. (2015). Biomimicry: A path to sustainable innovation. Design Issues, 31(3), 66–73. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43829335
“Low-Energy Chemical Reactions Inspired by Photosynthesis.” (n.d.). AskNature. https://asknature.org/innovation/low-energy-chemical-reactions-inspired-by-photosynthesis/
Shi, W., Atlar, M., Norman, R., Day, S., & Aktas, B. (2019). Effect of waves on the leading-edge undulated tidal turbines. Renewable Energy, 131, 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.072
“Temporal Stability of Consumer Preferences for Solar Energy.” (2017). Energy Policy and Innovation Center (EPIcenter). https://epicenter.energy.gatech.edu/2026/03/11/temporal-stability-of-consumer-preferences-for-solar-energy/
“Tests.” (2014, December 15). WhalePower Corporation. https://whalepowercorp.wordpress.com/testing-and-third-party-testing/
“Resilient Wave Energy Technology Inspired by Underwater Flora.” (n.d.). AskNature. https://asknature.org/innovation/resilient-wave-energy-technology-inspired-by-underwater-flora/
Whittlesey, R. W., Liska, S., & Dabiri, J. O. (2010). Fish schooling as a basis for vertical axis wind turbine farm design. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 5(3), 035005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/5/3/035005
Yeung, C. W. S., Liu, Y., Vahey, D. M., Cobb, S. J., Andrei, V., Coito, A. M., Manuel, R. R., Pereira, I. A. C., & Reisner, E. (2025). Semi-artificial leaf interfacing organic semiconductors and enzymes for solar chemical synthesis. Joule, 102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025.102165
